Why Siege is a good Idea.

Dannie · Aug 27, 2011

@Valetino

Alright.. You called my bluff.

But still no need to be a repulsive, irritating prick?

SO WHAT IF I USED THE THESAURUS FOR THOSE LONG WORDS. :'(

--- merged: Aug 27, 2011 at 8:49 PM ---

+ Guys, I did link you guys the Factions config file and I only had one back via Private Message.

How about those who want siege, pick that up and have a browse. How would you do it?

Those who don't want it, pick it up and see what you can keep constant and will remain fair.

Valetino · Aug 27, 2011

@ Tanja

@ Dannie I knew it.

Playerer · Aug 27, 2011

Valetino said:
@ Tanja

http://youtu.be/nc_LIR5ExIU

lolololololol is that what you look like in real life?

or is that your MUM?

womp

And Dannie, I'll take a look at that and get back to you.

Velocityshot · Aug 27, 2011

Valetino said:
Velo....Velo...Velo...

Did you just complain to me about putting up pictures on a thread? srs?

Why do people agree with me? because I am right...? oh no couldn't be something logical like that....

As for likes and such, you say I am immature for stuff like saying "No siege has more links" yet, you are being childish by pointing out half the story, I also say, anti siege players give more reasons other than "I like siege" like pro siege players do.

People don't want siege proven by comments/reasons and votes, end of.

Also so what if you, Laithes and Tanja want Siege? so what if because some other players have not been playing as long as you? I am sorry but I missed that you had to be playing on the server for a certain amount of time to have your opinion matter, Sorry Hitler.

Also you are proving my sarcastic pictures right:/

Lul. UNFUNNY PICTURES!

And PvP is pointless! Why is it Aggression PvP!? So we can spawn camp and kill a few people at spawn?! Is that Aggression PvP!?

Like seriously! We have nothing to do! Nobody does! Nobody fights! If this wasn't "Aggression PvP" I wouldn't care, but it is! There is not PvP going on!

LOTS OF !!!!!!!!s

But seriously Vale. What do you expect people to do? Build bases, become rich, so they can. . . ? They can't do anything after!

Valetino · Aug 27, 2011

No, that is a world famous performer....you moron?

Also, thanks for lining this one up

Playerer · Aug 27, 2011

Valetino said:
No, that is a world famous performer....you moron?

Never heard of him.

Sea · Aug 27, 2011

Echo vs Doni who will win!?

Velocityshot · Aug 27, 2011

I'm not necessarily saying "GO SIEGE! IN EVERY WAY" but I think the idea is that of a good one so we can actually fight. If someone can implement something that makes the downfall of a faction possible, then yeah lets do it.

And your whole speech on rage quitters is a joke.

Jordtz, Lloydies, Scopulus, FNG+mentos, Exeal, CommanderChedo, GoMLV, and about 7 other people. Those were all the people involved in their factions being FUCKED, yet not one of them quit.

--- merged: Aug 27, 2011 at 9:02 PM ---

Maybe just make it a rule so people can get into your faction base, like "no hiding in your base like a pussy"

Sea · Aug 27, 2011

or... The admins can be PvPing?

I'd pay to see 10 people run at doni with stone swords

Velocityshot · Aug 27, 2011

Or "When challenged, a faction must fight"

--- merged: Aug 27, 2011 at 9:05 PM ---

Nobody damn fights here because it isn't possible and it has no outcome but a few dirt pieces you loot of the nub's body.

CurlyPhillio · Aug 28, 2011

Tanjaroxursox said:
OKAY, GO, SIEGE SIEGE SIEGE.

Made me chuckle.

I've given up on page 2, but think we should have a crack at siege. If it fails, we can drop the idea after trying it.

jeffrocks26 · Aug 28, 2011

Velo I do want siege. I just want Valetino to shut up.

Laithes · Aug 28, 2011

Valetino, I just looked at the mine-status PvP servers, and many of them have factions and no siege. So this makes our server unique how? I would post IP's but that could count as advertising. So go and take a look for yourself.

Valetino · Aug 28, 2011

The Noodle · Aug 28, 2011

Sorry guys but I'm not reading 5 pages of you arguing. When this discussion is over agree on a summary and tag me in the post. [/leaves]

Sea · Aug 28, 2011

No read 1.1 dev notes?

The Noodle · Aug 28, 2011

Dev notes are published by administrators. I read those.

Laithes · Sep 21, 2011

I saw a few attributes in the .config that might create a situation that works towards appeasing everyone in this situation. Turn off the shield factor entirely, so both sides take the same amount of damage regardless of who owns the terrain. Slow down power regen per minute, it really needs to be an effective punishment for dying, maybe set it to .2 per minute?. Also increase the amount of power lost on death, maybe even as high as ten, so that any kill is a huge push for attacking parties. This way people still have land that is completely defend-able, but it's more possible for attackers to gain control of territory. Only problem I can see is finding some form of encouragement for the defenders to leave their base and try to drive off the attackers. Maybe require that conquest attempts require a bunker, built with at least 5 gold and 3 diamond blocks to be built. The resources of the bunker walls or even while they're in the inventories of the builders would be an incentive to leave the base and try to kill the attackers. It also means that defenders will have to worry less about conquests, because not many people want to throw out diamond blocks to try to claim something. Sound fair to everyone?

Velocityshot · Sep 21, 2011

Cub_Nake · Sep 22, 2011

Laithes said:
I saw a few attributes in the .config that might create a situation that works towards appeasing everyone in this situation. Turn off the shield factor entirely, so both sides take the same amount of damage regardless of who owns the terrain. Slow down power regen per minute, it really needs to be an effective punishment for dying, maybe set it to .2 per minute?. Also increase the amount of power lost on death, maybe even as high as ten, so that any kill is a huge push for attacking parties. This way people still have land that is completely defend-able, but it's more possible for attackers to gain control of territory. Only problem I can see is finding some form of encouragement for the defenders to leave their base and try to drive off the attackers. Maybe require that conquest attempts require a bunker, built with at least 5 gold and 3 diamond blocks to be built. The resources of the bunker walls or even while they're in the inventories of the builders would be an incentive to leave the base and try to kill the attackers. It also means that defenders will have to worry less about conquests, because not many people want to throw out diamond blocks to try to claim something. Sound fair to everyone?

Killing restores half of the lost power? Killing is the only way to regen power? <This would make pvp essential.

Why Siege is a good Idea.

Level 29

Level 25

Level 37

Level 30

Level 25

Level 37

Level 35

Level 30

Level 35

Level 30

Level 32

Level 27

Level 47

Level 25

Level 48

Level 35

Level 48

Level 47

Level 30

Level 46

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency