MW3 or BF3
- Thread starter BROSxXxDANIEL
- Start date
I hate both for multi-player, but at least Battlefield 2's campaign was fun to play. CoD= Same exact shit again and again with updates that add nothing good or significant to the game. Not to mention the especially pointless shit they thought would work, like explosive RC cars. And you're not Gordon Freeman, so drop the crossbow. BF2= People using vehicles to tear down the spawn's walls, and just spam rounds into the spawn area. If BF3 fixes BF2's vehicle problem I would try multi-player, and I'll try the campaign if I get a chance to do so.
P.S. Firefox thinks that multi-player should be mulch-player.
P.S. Firefox thinks that multi-player should be mulch-player.
RC cars - Treyarch. Please keep your game opinions on the actual GAME. (protip: Treyarch does not create MW, they created WaW and blops).
Also, BF has vehicles. There is NO way to balance vehicles, because they are SUPPOSED to be OP. So, the whole game becomes about who can get in a vehicle.
Also, BF has vehicles. There is NO way to balance vehicles, because they are SUPPOSED to be OP. So, the whole game becomes about who can get in a vehicle.
Vehicle's have alwayed been OP. Doesn't matter the game.
"Tank beats ghost, tank beats hunter, Tank beats everything!"
But ofcourse you could knock a tank out with a nicely placed grenade or C4 pack.
Very powerful, but very weak. Depends on how good you are.
Never played Blops, wasn't going to get it unless I heard good things about it.
WaW was only purchased because everyone else was playing it for some time.
Got MW1 and 2, I liked the campaigns, but I dislike SP games. [Excluding Oblivion and hopefully Skyrim.] MP didn't ammuse me because of it's repition and small maps.
Hence, BF is godlike compared, from my view.
"Tank beats ghost, tank beats hunter, Tank beats everything!"
But ofcourse you could knock a tank out with a nicely placed grenade or C4 pack.
Very powerful, but very weak. Depends on how good you are.
Never played Blops, wasn't going to get it unless I heard good things about it.
WaW was only purchased because everyone else was playing it for some time.
Got MW1 and 2, I liked the campaigns, but I dislike SP games. [Excluding Oblivion and hopefully Skyrim.] MP didn't ammuse me because of it's repition and small maps.
Hence, BF is godlike compared, from my view.
I'd like to see a vehicle that isn't kill-able with a med-range weapon and boarding it in Halo 3 or Reach. And it's not just the vehicles, it's the fact that you can only spawn in one spot in BF2, and you can destroy walls to hit the spawn with anything you want to, you could even just spam it with snipers. And I didn't buy the newest CoD either, but all of my friends did, and I'm taking them to therapy for continued playing of it.
Well in Halo, the vehicles health is the same as your health. If it was not kill-able why would they put it in the game. However do you remember the Elephant's from Sandtrap in Halo 3. They couldn't be destroyed but anyone could kill you. "Hold RB to fli... wait how'd you do that!"
However, I don't enjoy comparing Halo to the CoD/BF games.
It's too cartoony to do that. Halo is one of the few FPS's I can put up with for long occasions.
However, I don't enjoy comparing Halo to the CoD/BF games.
It's too cartoony to do that. Halo is one of the few FPS's I can put up with for long occasions.
