SameTeem
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Streams
Streams
Multi-Viewer
Games
What's new
Media
Resources
Free TeamSpeak Channel
TeamSpeak
TeamSpeak
Vote
Rank System
Make a Channel
Free Channel Information
Servers
Sourcebans
New posts
SameTeem
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Streams
Multi-Viewer
Games
What's new
Media
Resources
Free TeamSpeak Channel
TeamSpeak
Vote
Rank System
Make a Channel
Free Channel Information
Servers
Sourcebans
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Download TeamSpeak Today
Proudly sponsored by TeamSpeak
Forums
General
General
AMD Bulldozer FX Released!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M1_Mercenary" data-source="post: 21166" data-attributes="member: 20"><p>Im not a fan of tablets, laptops are nice however. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>and a nice little wall of text I would like to throw out.</p><p></p><p>you may see AMD return to the K10.5 and improve it. Why you ask?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well lets look at intel. they have been improving on the P6 Architecture (Pentium Pro, 1995) up untill they thought "Lets build a new architecture from the ground up!" so they built the Netburst Architecture (Pentium 4). which was frankly.. shit due to thermals and power consumption and low efficiency.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So they went back to the PIII version of the P6 Architecture, and improved it to make the Pentium M due to they needed an efficient processor in laptops as the P4's thermals was just too high. Add in more improvements and you got Core/Core2, and if you look hard enough amongst all the improvements/additions, even Nehalem and Sandy Bridge is based on an architecture made back in 1995. However, Intel did get some good things out of Netburst, which is being used in their modern CPU's which would be Hyperthreading, Aggressive branch predictor, and QDR (Which was replaced with Nehalem with a integrated memory controller and Quickpath Interconnect. With Lynnfield and Sandy Bridge nomming the entire north bridge into the CPU.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think AMD will learn that their idea of "Lets make a radically new architecture that can clock like hell!" is stupid. and may (I hope... for their CPU operations survival!) they take what they have learned with Bulldozer. and go back to improving their Phenom II.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right now if Intel really wanted to fuck over AMD, it would drop the prices on its chipset/CPU. as its cheaper to make motherboards with just a Southbridge chip. AMD still uses a North and South bridge. (which is sorta a mixed result) It is more expensive but it allows for them to keep compatibility easily, unlike Intel who has to change socket configurations with almost every update as the CPU also does the task of the Northbridge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M1_Mercenary, post: 21166, member: 20"] Im not a fan of tablets, laptops are nice however. :) and a nice little wall of text I would like to throw out. you may see AMD return to the K10.5 and improve it. Why you ask? Well lets look at intel. they have been improving on the P6 Architecture (Pentium Pro, 1995) up untill they thought "Lets build a new architecture from the ground up!" so they built the Netburst Architecture (Pentium 4). which was frankly.. shit due to thermals and power consumption and low efficiency. So they went back to the PIII version of the P6 Architecture, and improved it to make the Pentium M due to they needed an efficient processor in laptops as the P4's thermals was just too high. Add in more improvements and you got Core/Core2, and if you look hard enough amongst all the improvements/additions, even Nehalem and Sandy Bridge is based on an architecture made back in 1995. However, Intel did get some good things out of Netburst, which is being used in their modern CPU's which would be Hyperthreading, Aggressive branch predictor, and QDR (Which was replaced with Nehalem with a integrated memory controller and Quickpath Interconnect. With Lynnfield and Sandy Bridge nomming the entire north bridge into the CPU. I think AMD will learn that their idea of "Lets make a radically new architecture that can clock like hell!" is stupid. and may (I hope... for their CPU operations survival!) they take what they have learned with Bulldozer. and go back to improving their Phenom II. Right now if Intel really wanted to fuck over AMD, it would drop the prices on its chipset/CPU. as its cheaper to make motherboards with just a Southbridge chip. AMD still uses a North and South bridge. (which is sorta a mixed result) It is more expensive but it allows for them to keep compatibility easily, unlike Intel who has to change socket configurations with almost every update as the CPU also does the task of the Northbridge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
General
AMD Bulldozer FX Released!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top