Siege Poll 2.0

[Laithes]

Well seeing as Echo didn't like my poll, probably because of the 'no' option, I've decided to re-do it.



If you don't know the arguments already, here's both the threads relating to the topic at hand, which of course is whether or not to include siege.



Pro siege: http://aggression.bowlofnoodles.net/threads/why-siege-is-a-good-idea.581/



Anti siege: http://aggression.bowlofnoodles.net...siege-is-a-very-bad-idea.562/page-2#post-3924



Please no arguing in this thread, it's just to get votes on who actually wants it and who doesn't.

 

[Iguana]

NIGA YOU GAAAAAAY



HOW 'BOUT NO, NIGA

 

[Sea]

Well,

THE GAME

again.

 

[Cosine]

english muffins

 

[Wren]

I do not like the idea but I do want the server to evolve.



the game

 

[Valetino]

Shocking, siege isn't wanted.



Wait, didn't my thread prove this already...



Laithes just stop it, everyone else who is pro seige, just stop.

Siege isn't coming, it is clearly unwanted.



You guys are just creating aggro by trying to keep the argument alive.



This is basically a troll thread.

 

[Sea]

​

Yes, it seems interesting.​

5 vote(s)​

26.3%​

*​

No, I prefer the server as is.​

14 vote(s)​

73.7%

​

Tragic.

 

[The Noodle]

Laithes, you seem to lack an understanding of the concept of an unbiased poll. "No, I prefer the server as is." is not an unbiased option. Locked.