SameTeem
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
What's new
Featured content
Media
Resources
Free TeamSpeak Channel
TeamSpeak
TeamSpeak
Vote
Rank System
Make a Channel
Free Channel Information
Servers
Sourcebans
New posts
SameTeem
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
Media
Resources
Free TeamSpeak Channel
TeamSpeak
Vote
Rank System
Make a Channel
Free Channel Information
Servers
Sourcebans
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Download TeamSpeak Today
Proudly sponsored by TeamSpeak
Forums
Games
Minecraft
Aggression PvP
Reasons why siege is a very bad idea.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wizard12" data-source="post: 17738" data-attributes="member: 2308"><p>Well the idea with controlling the gates is that you try to take over the gates controlled by other factions for ease of access, movement denial and resupply purposes. Because the 'city' would be incredibly large, it would be good to store supplies inside fortified ruins or hidden bunkers when the factions start getting close to the interior of the 'city' due to the time it would take to /f home then teleport to the faction 'lobby' we could call it - a small base or square outside the warzone with no pvp - and then traval all the way back inside the city. (Not to mention having to fight mobs, defuse traps that could have been laid/take a long route round/escape or fight off ambushes)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This means that faction would have to scout out the supply bases to reduce the fighting ability of their opposing factions. Smaller factions will probably mean less stuff which means smaller bases, these being harder to find - so in theory the system should balance itself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If a faction foregoes the use of supply bases, they're supplies either have to be stored inside gatehouses (which are major targets), hidden chests which is impractical or have to wait the 10 - 20 minuets for a few stacks of arrows/fresh armour, risking the supplies being lost in an ambush, being destroyed by mines or lost to mobs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Either way, you still have raiding bases and raiding players for supplies, it's just that it is optional for the faction. If a supply base is found, you can have all the scouting, planning and preparing you want before finally going at it. At least that was what the original idea was attempting to get across.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But a problem I thought of would be map making. Perhaps we could all make the it together (the admins adding secrets, adjusting things with plugins, ect) and then it would be fairly balanced as everyone would know a little bit about the map.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>@Dannie: The bonus of capturing a zone would be ease of access through owning a gate and quick resupply (though nothing would stop enemies building secret forts and supply deports in your zones <img src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%2064%2064%22%3E%3Ctext%20x%3D%2250%25%22%20y%3D%2250%25%22%20text-anchor%3D%22middle%22%20dominant-baseline%3D%22central%22%20font-size%3D%2254%22%3E%F0%9F%98%89%3C%2Ftext%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="22" height="22" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ) Another possible bonus could be a steady stream of money from each gatehouse/zone.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As an addition to the idea, each faction could use a coloured block of wool for their flag, and uses those blocks (in a high visible place) to show who owns what gatehouse/fort. If another faction can steal the opposing factions flag and replace it with theirs, then they can lay claim to that gatehouse/fort.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wizard12, post: 17738, member: 2308"] Well the idea with controlling the gates is that you try to take over the gates controlled by other factions for ease of access, movement denial and resupply purposes. Because the 'city' would be incredibly large, it would be good to store supplies inside fortified ruins or hidden bunkers when the factions start getting close to the interior of the 'city' due to the time it would take to /f home then teleport to the faction 'lobby' we could call it - a small base or square outside the warzone with no pvp - and then traval all the way back inside the city. (Not to mention having to fight mobs, defuse traps that could have been laid/take a long route round/escape or fight off ambushes) This means that faction would have to scout out the supply bases to reduce the fighting ability of their opposing factions. Smaller factions will probably mean less stuff which means smaller bases, these being harder to find - so in theory the system should balance itself. If a faction foregoes the use of supply bases, they're supplies either have to be stored inside gatehouses (which are major targets), hidden chests which is impractical or have to wait the 10 - 20 minuets for a few stacks of arrows/fresh armour, risking the supplies being lost in an ambush, being destroyed by mines or lost to mobs. Either way, you still have raiding bases and raiding players for supplies, it's just that it is optional for the faction. If a supply base is found, you can have all the scouting, planning and preparing you want before finally going at it. At least that was what the original idea was attempting to get across. But a problem I thought of would be map making. Perhaps we could all make the it together (the admins adding secrets, adjusting things with plugins, ect) and then it would be fairly balanced as everyone would know a little bit about the map. @Dannie: The bonus of capturing a zone would be ease of access through owning a gate and quick resupply (though nothing would stop enemies building secret forts and supply deports in your zones ;) ) Another possible bonus could be a steady stream of money from each gatehouse/zone. As an addition to the idea, each faction could use a coloured block of wool for their flag, and uses those blocks (in a high visible place) to show who owns what gatehouse/fort. If another faction can steal the opposing factions flag and replace it with theirs, then they can lay claim to that gatehouse/fort. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Games
Minecraft
Aggression PvP
Reasons why siege is a very bad idea.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
